Contract life cycle management software is not new, operating since the ‘80s as a document management and process application. It got a boost in popularity from the launch of customer relationship management systems in the ‘90s and the cloud in the 2000s. But the advent of digitizing contracts – as opposed to an electronic version (such as a PDF) attached to an account – gave rise to a new generation of CLM providers, such as Evisort.
With its roots in Harvard Law School, Evisort was founded in 2016 to use artificial intelligence with digitized contracts to automate the labor-intensive and time-consuming tasks of
Since the initial launch in 2020, Evisort’s platform has been well received, acquiring diverse customers from smaller growth companies to well-known enterprise logos. Unlike some CLM vendors, Evisort’s AI roots led to a focus on understanding the content within contracts. Vendors focusing on process management tasks such as document process flow, approvals, storage, indexing and search are now developing AI capabilities.
Evisort has continued to develop its platform, extending core, AI-based capabilities to document processing and more advanced approval flows. This relaunch included a shift in focus from CLM primarily benefitting legal teams to playing a more impactful role in revenue management. It is in the revenue life cycle where efficient, accurate and timely contract generation and cooperation between employees in sales, revenue and legal is of great importance for a successful sales engagement and creating the right customer experience. It is equally important for new customer acquisition.
This also includes the purchasing side, where efficient processing of contracts ensures timely and accurate purchasing decisions. In general, contract analysis enables understanding of which clauses cause the most redline
In 2023, prior to the more headline-grabbing launch of ChatGPT, Evisort announced a new initiative to use AI to generate contracts. This is a logical progression in the use of AI, and like many early applications of generative AI, it is less a fully automated contract process and more a productivity advance for many contracts that need standardization. Based on predetermined parameters, AI can safely generate contracts for specific events with the added step of manual review, reducing manual effort. But it is possible to imagine a time when most contracts are generated by AI and tailored for a specific event. Eventually, redlining could be automated between two AI bots equipped with the relevant knowledge of how to respond, whether as a buyer or seller. Research Director, Robert Kugel, has recently written about the role of AI in contract management.
Organizations seeking to deploy AI-powered CLM would do well to focus on institutionalized processes and approaches. Adding AI could encounter resistance, either from a participant who believes his or her role is diminished or those suspicious and worried about inadvertent mistakes made by unsupervised AI. These capabilities are not “free” in terms of subscription payments for the application nor the effort to change processes and team organization. Evisort should be considered a potential vendor and partner for organizations looking for a competitive advantage from a more streamlined and effective contract process.